Taffel v. Taffel

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date filed: 1952-03-24
Citations: 279 A.D. 938, 111 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5372
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion

The record on appeal does not disclose whether the limitation of the fine to $180 was based on a finding that the arrears were not more than that, or whether the fine was limited to a portion of the arrears, in discretion. If based on a finding that the arrears were only $180, the finding would be incorrect, as undoubtedly based on a requirement to pay $10 a week and not $25 a week. (See Bartenbach V. Bartenbach, 271 App. Div. 799.) The issues upon which the several applications are based can best be determined in this matter after a hearing. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1024.]