900 F.2d 253
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charlie Earl MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ms. WHITFIELD; Ms. Johnson; Mr. Rowe; Ed McCullen;
Joseph H. Lofton; Mr. Hall; Phyllis Woods,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6011.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 5, 1990.
Decided March 20, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-915-CRT).
Charlie Earl Martin, appellant pro se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charlie Earl Martin appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Whitfield, C/A No. 89-915-CRT (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED