Regardless of whether applicable sections of the by-laws of the exchange be deemed to provide for statutory or common-law arbitration, there is an arbitrable dispute between appellant and respondent, who are both members of the New York Coffee and Sugar Exchange, Inc., and bound by its by-laws including section 45 thereof. As to the contract to arbitrate and the arbitrable dispute exist, all controversies are for the arbitrators including the timeliness oí the so-called adjudication proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ. [See post, p. 1013.]
In re the Arbitration between Blanco & Farr & Co.
Related Cases
- In re the Arbitration between Blanco & Farr & Co.
- In re the Arbitration between 142 Fiftieth Corp. & 150 East 50th Street Corp.
- In re the Arbitration of Differences between White Court Construction Corp. & Fordham Cornice Works, Inc.
- In Re the Arbitration Between Ilios Shipping & Trading Corp. & American Anthracite & Bituminous Coal Corp.
- In re the Arbitration of Differences between White Court Construction Corp. & Fordham Cornice Works, Inc.