By the return it appears that the relator is detained in the county jail under a warrant of commitment made *321by a magistrate of the City of New York. The certificate of conviction and warrant of commitment (Code Crim. Pro., §§ 891-2) recite that she was'brought before the said magistrate on June 2, 1901, upon complaint of being, a vagrant, and that on the said day the magistrate heard the case and convicted her, and committed her to the county jail for one month at hard labor.
As the day was Sunday it is claimed that the certificate of conviction and warrant of commitment are void. This is so. At common law.no judicial act could be done on Sunday (Story v. Elliot, 8 Cow. 27; Van Vechten v. Paddock, 12 Johns. 178). The same rule is substantially declared by section 6 of our Code of Civil Procedure. The reservation therein that “ this section does not prevent the exercise of the jurisdiction of a magistrate, where it is necessary to preserve the peace, or, in a criminal case, to arrest, commit or discharge a person charged with an offense ”, does not permit of a trial on Sunday. The words "commit or discharge” have no reference to a trial. .They mean simply that persons arrested can be discharged on Sunday by a magistrate if there be no ground for holding them, or that they can be committed for a hearing if that be the proper course.
The relator is discharged.