Memorandum. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.
Defendant’s attorney did not demonstrate that he was a person with sufficient knowledge of the facts to respond to the interrogatories (CPLR 3134, subd [a]).
Furthermore, the court’s imposition of costs did not constitute an abuse of discretion (CPLR 8106).
Concur: Groat, P. J., Schwartzwald and O’Connor, JJ.