Motions (1) by plaintiff for summary judgment on the first cause.of action; (2) by defendant to dismiss-the first and second causes of action, and (3) by defendant for summary judgment on the third cause of action.
The rights of the parties, landlord and tenant, became fixed at the time of the dispossess proceedings. It is well settled that the ‘1 6 courts will not give retrospective operation to a statute which interferes with antecedent rights in the absence of an unequivocal expression in the statute that the Legislature intended that the statute should have such effect.’ ” (Shielcrawt v. Moffett, 294 N. Y. 180, 189.) Accordingly, the first cause of action, which seeks to recover damages by reason of the defendant’s violation of the statute, must.be dismissed.
The second cause of action is in fraud, and alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The final order in the summary proceedings is not res judicata and a bar to the action. The motion to dismiss the second cause of action is, therefore, denied.
A triable issue is raised as to the third cause of action. The . motion for summary judgment is, accordingly, denied.