Mays v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Hammer, J.

(dissenting). I dissent and vote for affirmance. In my opinion bailment and contributory negligence were questions of fact (Hasbrouck v. New York Central & Hudson Riv. R. R. Co., 202 N. Y. 363; Reisinger v. Pullman Co., 248 App. Div. 171, 252 App. Div. 87).

Pécora, J., concurs with Eder, J.; Hammer, J., dissents in memorandum.

Judgment reversed, etc.