People ex rel. Attorney General v. Provines

Rhodes, J., dissenting:

I concur with Mr. Justice Sanderson in his reasoning and conclusion upon the first point. Dpon the second point, without expressing an opinion as to the conclusiveness of his argument, it is sufficient to say that I am not prepared to overrule a series of decisions almost continuous from Burgoyne’s Case, in 1855, to the present time, and therefore dissent from the judgment.