Schultz v. McLean

De Haven, J., concurring.

I concur in the judgment of reversal. In my opinion, the evidence is insufficient to justify the finding of the court below that Robinson acted as the agent of McLean in and about the transfer of the lands in controversy.

I think, however, if the finding as to Robinson’s agency was supported by the evidence, the plaintiffs would be entitled to the relief which they sought in this action.