Jackson ex. dem. Jackway v. Stiles

IT was ruled that if a perfon be admitted to defend on payment of cofts, and, after entering into the confent rule; ’ keep out or .the way to avoid being ferved with a copy of the Ca. fa. the cafual ejector, a rule will be granted to Ihew caufe, why an attachment ihould not go againft him, and that fervice of that rule, at the defendant’s houfe, ihalt be fufScient.