Andrus v. Bealls

Sutherland, J.

at first, thought the second plea, viz. of notice to revoke, &e. a good one, and that the facts stated ope rated to release the defendants, Who were sureties; though *he held the third plea bad, as the sheriff was not bound to defend on the attachment, (a)

*739Savage, Chief J. and Woodworth, J. were, however, against both pleas; and

Judgment was for the plaintiff.

END OP THE CASES IN THE SUPREME CGCBt.

Tide Stone v. Hooker, ante 154.