United States v. Walter Andrew Morris

911 F.2d 725
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Walter Andrew MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6078.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR No. 86-37-5)

Walter Andrew Morris, appellant pro se.

John Douglas McCullough, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Walter Andrew Morris appeals from the district court's order which denied his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Morris, CR-86-37-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.