Defendant’s attorney seems to have omitted a material part of his case; he should show by affidavit that the taxation was opposed, and the items objected to were taxed under objection by the taxing officer.
Denied with costs, without prejudice.
Defendant’s attorney seems to have omitted a material part of his case; he should show by affidavit that the taxation was opposed, and the items objected to were taxed under objection by the taxing officer.
Denied with costs, without prejudice.