The complaint was filed in this cause by the plaintiff as a tax payer and corporator of this city, as well on his own behalf as of all others similarly sitúated, to restrain the defendant the mayor, &c., from paying any money to the defendant Earley, on a contract made with the street commissioner, for regulating and grading 58th street, between 8th and 9th avenues. It also prays that the defendant Farley may be restrained from any further proceedings under said contract.
The common council by ordinance passed Dec. 27, 1856, directed that 58th street, between 8th and 9th avenues, be regulated and graded. By the ordinances of the city, it then *429became' the duty of the commissioner to issue proposals inviting bids to have the work done by contract. In such proposals it was estimated that there would be of earth excavation to complete said work, 3,501 cubic yards, and rock excavation, 12,388 cubic yards.
Bids were received as follows:—
EARTH ROCK
per cubic yd. per cubic yd.
Terrence Farley, $1.85 00 $6,476.85
and from various other persons. On the assumption made by the street commissioner, that there were 3,501 cubic yards of earth to be excavated, and that this was to be done for $1.85 a cubic yard, and that 12,388 cubic yards of rock were to be excavated, and this was to be done for nothing, Farley was the lowest bidder. On this assumption the street commissioner reported the bids to the common council, and the contract was awarded to Farley, and a contract was entered into between him and the street commissioner, dated May 5, 1857, by which he agreed to do the work on the terms mentioned in his bid, to wit: for every cubic yard of earth excavated, he was to receive $1.85, and for every cubic yard of rock excavation, nothing. If the correct amount of excavation of earth and rock had been taken as the basis of the contract, and which is now ascertained to have been as follows: Earth excavation, 6,345 cubic yards
Bock 7,140 “
the bids would have been as follows:—
EARTH ROOK
per cubic yd. per cubic yd.
Farley . . . $1.85 00 $12,848.25
Taylor . . . . 35 84 8,344.35
M'Grath . . . 20 95 8,077.00
Masterton . . 1.00 25 8,705.00
Ellis . . . . . 15 90 7,377.75
Oonolly. . . . 61* 62* 8,653.81
Hodgins . . . 62 64 8,811.50
*430■From this it is manifest that the bid of Farley to do the work is the highest bid made; that he will receive $4,000 more for the work than any other bidder, and more than $5,000 over and above what Ellis offered to do the same work for.
It is clear, therefore, beyond all contradiction, that the contract was awarded and given, and made with, not the lowest bidder, but the highest.
The provisions of the charter and ordinances in force at this time, were such as to make it obligatory upon the street commissioner and the common council to award, and to make the contracts with the lowest bidder. (Section 12 of the charter of 1853, Dav. Laws, p. 212, § 501, of Ordinances of 1849, as amended.)
It is well settled that no contract can be made which will bind the corporation, which is made contrary to law. (See McSpedon agt. Stout, 4 Abbott, 23, and cases there cited.)
It follows, therefore, that this contract, having been made in direct violation of law, cannot be enforced, and under the decisions made in this district, the plaintiff, as a tax payer, has a clear right to invoke the aid of this court to restrain its execution, or the payment of any money out of the city treasury on account thereof.
A judgment will be entered declaring the contract illegal and void, and that a perpetual injunction be granted, as prayed for in the complaint.