Potter v. Benniss

Per Curiam.

An action for money had and received, will not lie against the overseer of the highways, in such a case. If any suit can be sustained, it must be an action on the case, quasi ex delicto. It would be inconvenient and vexatious, to permit public officers to be sued before a justice In this way, without any specific charge of mal-conduct.

•Judgment reversed.