Weill v. Malone

Pratt, J.,

(dissenting.) This motion only involves questions of fact, and an examination of the affidavits satisfies us that the matter was correctly decided below. The evidence failed to show with sufficient certainty that the defendants had disposed of any of their property with intent to defraud their creditors, and whatever there was alleged by plaintiff from which such an inference might bedrawn was fully met and denied or explained by the defendants. Order affirmed, with costs.