Sixth Ave. R. v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.

Per Curiam.

Upon examining the brief of the counsel for the appellants in this case we do not find any questions of law raised which have not been previously considered and disposed of by this court, and therefore it is not necessary to reconsider them upon this appeal. Upon the questions of fact involved, it does not appear that the learned judge below has committed any errors which would justify this court in reversing the judgment. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, witli costs.