Shultz v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

PUTNAM, J.,

(concurring.) The case is a doubtful one. It is not clear that the evidence was sufficient to sustain a verdict establisMng negligence on the part of defendant or freedom from negligence on the part of plaintiff. It is, however, for the interests of the parties that the questions involved should be authoritatively settled by the court of appeals, and I therefore, though doubtingly, concur.

MAYHAM, P. J., concurs in result.'