Emmett J. Stebbins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

917 F.2d 1313

286 U.S.App.D.C. 383

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Emmett J. STEBBINS, Appellant,
v.
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 89-7281.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 13, 1990.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and HARRY T. EDWARDS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This case was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is

2

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court's orders filed October 17, 1989, and November 20, 1989, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum filed November 20, 1989.

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.