In re Anderson

Daniels, J.

The only question involved was whether there was proper proof of publication, which was of the same character as that in Petition of Phillips, ante, p. 484, and the same doctrine was held as in that case. It was also held that the cases of Matter of Douglass, 46 N. Y. 42, and Matter of Astor, 50 id. 363, did not conflict with such doctrine.

Order reversed.