Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; Matter of Brooklyn Hosp. v Lennon, 45 NY2d 820).
Panico v. Young
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Date filed: 1979-01-09
Citations: 46 N.Y.2d 847, 386 N.E.2d 1334, 414 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1805
Copy CitationsLead Opinion