Motion for leave to appeal, etc., denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; Matter of Whelan v Griffin, 63 NY2d 650).
In re Sean X.
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Date filed: 1984-10-30
Citations: 63 N.Y.2d 943, 483 N.Y.S.2d 688, 473 N.E.2d 40, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4726
Copy CitationsLead Opinion