OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Pending appeal of his conviction, defendant moved to enlarge the record on appeal to include minutes of the Grand Jury proceedings. Defendant included a request for the same relief in his brief to the Appellate Division and also requested permission to file a supplemental brief if necessary. The motion was referred to the panel assigned to hear the appeal, to be determined after an in camera review of the entire minutes. After review, the Appellate Division denied the motion to enlarge the record and affirmed defendant’s conviction and sentence.
Contrary to defendant’s arguments, the Appellate Division’s denial of his motion to enlarge the record did not deprive him of his due process right to a meaningful appeal nor under the circumstances of this case did it constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.