Altmayer v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

Per Curiam.

It is objected as a sufficient cause for reversal that certain findings and conclusions of law, found at the request of the defendants, were ■omitted from the decision made by the judge. In such a condition of the case ■there is no subject-matter of an appeal. There is no action of the court which may be reviewed. If the omission were irregular, the defendants might have made a motion for the correction of the omission, and they would have a right to appeal from a denial of the motion. In the absence of such a motion and ■order, the omission appears to be without objection on the part of the defendants, and that evinces a consent that the ease proceed and appeal be heard on the decision as made. The other objections have been decided unfavorably to the defendants by other cases. Judgment affirmed, with costs.