Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of State of New York

Related Cases

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, New Jersey Natural Gas Co., Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., Consolidated Gas Transmission Corp., Virginia Natural Gas, Inc., Washington Gas Light Co., East Ohio Gas Co., Process Gas Consumers Group, Dayton Power and Light Co., Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., Texas Gas Transmission Corp., Intervenors
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Electric and Gas Company, Philadelphia Gas Works, Philadelphia Electric Company, Bay State Gas Company, Intervenors
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation and Consolidated Gas Supply Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Memphis Light, Gas & Waterdivision, Intervenors. Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Terre Haute Gas Corporation, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Consolidated Gas Supply Corporation, Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, Intervenors. Louisville Gas and Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Indiana Gas Company, Inc., Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Consolidated Gas Supplycorporation, Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, Intervenors
Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company, Ozark Gas Transmission System, People's Counsel of Maryland, Tennessee Gas Pipe Line Company, East Tennessee Natural Gas Company, Midwestern Gas Transmission Company, Intervenors

925 F.2d 488

288 U.S.App.D.C. 257

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service
Commission of State of New York

NOS. 88-1750, 89-1569

United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.

JAN 07, 1991

D.C.D.C.

DENIED IN PART AND REMANDED.