This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, on a promissory note signed by the defendant, as administratrix on the estate of D. P. Hines, with an averment that said note was given in payment of an account due by the intestate and for the benefit of his estate. On the trial of the case, the jury, under the charge of the court, found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $566 46, principal, with interest. The defendant made a motion for a new trial on various grounds, which was overruled by the court, and the defendant excepted.
Many of the questions made by the plaintiff in error, were settled when this case was before this court on a former occasion: See 52 Georgia Reports, 500.
1. There was no error in admitting the evidence of Peabody as to the sayings of King, the defendant’s general agent in the management of her intestate’s estate, the agent, King, being dead.
Let the judgment of the court below, overruling the motion for a new trial, be affirmed.