Wise v. State

Lumpkin, J.

There was no error in admitting evidence; the-.charge complained of, when considered in connection with the entire charge given, was neither erroneous nor misleading, and. the evidence warranted the verdict Judgment affirmed. .

E. J. Reagan, T. W. Tlnmncm and W. T. Dicken, for ■plaintiff in error. O. H. B. Bloodioortflb, soUeitor-general, contra.