The evidence introduced upon the trial of this ease demanded' a verdict for the defendant. Consequently, the court committed no. ' error in directing a verdict in its favor.
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring, except Isumpkin, P. J., absent. Action for damages. Before F. O. Foster, judge pro bac ■vice. Baldwin superior court. July term, 1898. Roberts & Pottle, for plaintiff. Lawton & Cunningham and John T. Allen, for defendant.