The sole complaint being that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, and there being sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding, there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.The sole complaint being that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, and there being sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding, there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.