There being no error of law complained of, and there being evidence to sustain the verdict, there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.There being no error of law complained of, and there being evidence to sustain the verdict, there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.