Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Castellow

Cobb, J.

The requests to charge, so far as legal and pertinent, were in substance covered by the general charge. The evidence was sufficient to raise a presumption of negligence against the company, and a finding that the presumption had not been rebutted was authorized. The discretion of the trial judge in refusing to grant a new trial will not be interfered with.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Action for damages. Before Judge Sheffield. Quitman- superior court. March 14, 1904. William D. Kiddoo, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans and A. M. Baines, contra.