The evidence in this case being conflicting as to whether the husband, against whom habeas-corpus proceedings had been instituted by his wife to secure possession of their minor child five years of age, was a fit and proper person to have the custody and' control of the child, there was no abuse of the^ discretion vested in the habeas-corpus court in awarding the custody of the child to the mother.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices eoneur.