While I am of the opinion that the evidence on the trial was not sufficient to authorize the verdict, I concur in the opinion that the alleged newly discovered evidence would not probably produce a different result. Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur. A. L. Franklin, F. H. Saffold, W. W. Larsen, and Wilson, Bennett & Lamb din, for plaintiff in error. Thomas S. Felder/ attorney-general, Alfred Herrington, solicitor-general, Hines & Jordan, and Reuben R. Arnold, contra.