There being no complaint of any error of law committed on the1 trial, and the evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the discretion of the judge in refusing a new trial will not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur. Action for damages. Before Judge Freeman. Carroll superior court. July 10, 1912. Hall & Cleveland, J. E. Hall, and R. D. Jackson, for plaintiff in error. 0?. W. M err ell and -S. Holderness, contra.