Beck, J.
1. While the extracts from the charge of the court, complained of in the motion for á new trial, were not entirely free from verbal inaccuracies, they did not contain such material error as to afford ground for a new trial.
2. While the evidence supporting a verdict in plaintiff’s favor was slight, it can not be held that the verdict was without evidence to support it.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, for plaintiff in error.
W. E. Payne, contra.