Southern Railway Co. v. Ray

Russell, C. J.,

concurring specially. I do not think the opinion of the Court of Appeals was erroneous in any respect, save one. The practice of permitting counsel to read to the jury, as alleged, the conclusions of courts of last resort upon facts involved in specific eases cannot, be approved. Upon this ground of complaint, as contained in the amendment to the motion for a new trial, I concur in the reversal.