The exception in this ease is to a judgment directing a verdict for the defendant in a suit instituted by an obligee in a bond for title (being a written contract for the sale of land), for cancellation of the contract, and for damages on the ground of fraud. The pleadings and evidence did not make out a prima facie case of fraud,_ and the judgment directing a verdict for the defendant was not erroneous on the ground that the issues should have been submitted to the jury.
{a) The claim of'fraud related to the character of a loan that was placed
(6) The defendant’s answer set up a cross-demand in support of which evidence was introduced. There was no exception to the judgment in so far as it related to the cross-demand.
Judgment affirmed.