ON MOTION ROE REHEARING.
In the decision as handed down in this case on April 11, 1929, it was inadvertently stated that the plaintiff in error had been tried under an indictment and convicted, whereas the statement should have been that he was being held under a warrant based upon the indictment which was attacked as unconstitutional; and correction is made of that statement. After consideration of the motion for rehearing, the judgment of affirmance formerly rendered is adhered to.