Under the rulings in Bradham v. State, ante, involving the same homicide as in the present case, the court did not err in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except Russell, C. J., and Atkinson, J., who dissent.Under the rulings in Bradham v. State, ante, involving the same homicide as in the present case, the court did not err in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except Russell, C. J., and Atkinson, J., who dissent.