Palmer v. State

Bell, P. J., and Atkinson, J.,

who dissent from the ruling announced in the sixth headnote and the corresponding division of the opinion.

Bell, Presiding Justice. Understandin'g that the constitution*675ality of the charter provision is not involved, and therefore that we are expressing no opinion either way on that question, I concur in the foregoing dissent by Justice Atkinson. See Code, § 2-401; City of Atlanta v. Hudgins, 193 Ga. 618 (2) (19 S. E. 2d, 508); Griggs v. State, 130 Ga. 16 (60 S. E. 103); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Walts, 35 Ga. App. 447 (133 S. E. 476).