Spradley v. State

Wade, J.

1. Considered in connection with the charge as a whole, the excerpts complained of contain no error sufficient to require the grant of a new trial.

2. While the evidence is altogether circumstantial, it sufficiently supports the verdict of guilty, to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis.

3. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed..