Wade, J.
1. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance.
2. There' was no error in this case in admitting the evidence against the
Page 481
defendant, though it was obtained by an illegal search of his premises. Duren v. Thomasville, 125 Ga. 1 (53 S. E. 814); McAllister v. State, 17 Ga. App. 159 (86 S. E. 412).
Irwin &-Tison, for plaintiff in error.
J. A. Wright, solicitor, E. 8. Ault, contra.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.