Smith v. North Carolina Mutual Ass'n

Wade, O. J.

No error of law is complained of. There was evidence to support the finding of the judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury; and this court is therefore without authority to set aside the *662judgment rendered. There was positive testimony that a certain written release was executed by the plaintiff, freely and voluntarily, for a valuable consideration, and there was testimony to the contrary; and the trial judge settled the conflict in favor of the defendant.

Decided October 18, 1916. Action on insurance policy; from municipal court of Macon— Judge Chambers. February 11, 1916. H. F. Strohecher, Sam, B. Hunter, for plaintiff. A. T. Walden, contra.

Judgment affirmed.