Luke, J.
1. The exceptions to excerpts from the charge of the court to not require a reversal of the judgment in this case. The charge of the court, as matter of law, was abstractly correct, and if thfe defendant
Page 257
wished a more specific charge, it was incumbent on him to request it in writing.
James L. Key, for plaintiff in error.
Walter A. Sims, contra.
2. The court did not err in overruling the defendant’s demurrer.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there is no assignment of error that requires a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Wade, 0. J., and George, J., concur.