This case has been before this court heretofore, and is reported in 18 Ga. App. 86 (88 S. E. 906). It was then held that the petition set out a good cause of action. Thé jury were authorized to find, from the evidence, that the plaintiff had proved the case as laid; and, there being no error of law, and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is not erroneous.
Judgment affirmed.
Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.