In this ease the evidence relied Upon by the State to convict the defendants was wholly circumstantial,'and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. The court therefore erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur. Brinson & Ilaicher, for plaintiff in error. A. L. FranJclin, solicitor-general, John M. Graham, contra.