Clements v. State

Broyles, P. J.

The answer of the trial judge to the petition for certiorari was neither traversed nor excepted to. The evidence, as set forth in the answer, with the legal inferences and deductions arising therefrom, authorized the finding of the trial judge, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury; and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.