1. None of the several excerpts from the charge of the court, excepted to, when considered in connection with the entire charge, contains reversible error.
2. The court did not err in admitting in evidence the distilling apparatus found on the defendant's premises.
3. The verdict was amply supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.