The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; the evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion. t
Judgment affirmed.
Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; the evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion. t
Judgment affirmed.
Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.