1. The court did not err in overruling the exceptions of law to the auditor’s report.
2. The court erred in directing a verdict against the defendant upon the 1st, 2d, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th exceptions of facts to the auditor’s report, and in thereafter refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.